![[2024] UKUT 00436 (TCC)](https://backend.juristeca.com/files/emisores/logo_ICfrj4g.png){kind=logo}
Conclusions
Conclusion
I have considered all the other grounds of appeal put forward in oral submissions, contained in the speaking note or in the post hearing submissions and evidence. I reject all the grounds of appeal because they do not raise arguably material errors of law in the FTT’s Decision.
Permission to appeal to the Upper Tribunal is refused.
Signed: Date: 20 December 2024 JUDGE RUPERT JONES JUDGE OF THE UPPER TRIBUNAL |
- Heading
- JUDGE RUPERT JONES Introduction
- The application for permission to appeal to the UT
- UT’s jurisdiction in relation to appeals from the FTT
- The grounds of appeal
- Discussion, Analysis and Decision
- Ground (a)-(c)
- Ground (d)
- Ground (e)-(g)
- Ground (h)
- Ground (i) and (j)
- Grounds (k) and (l)
- The CGT appeal
- Further grounds from the speaking note / oral submissions
- Conclusion to the speaking note and fresh evidence application and grounds
- Problems with the bundle rendering the hearing procedurally unfair
- Conclusions