Grounds (k) and (l)
Grounds (k) and (l).
These grounds are that the HMRC Officer had insufficient information on which to make a discovery assessment.
I reject this ground as unarguable. The FTT was entitled to make the decision that it did on the evidence available to it for the reasons it gave at [55]-[68] of the Decision. The FTT accepted that HMRC’s assessing officer believed, and a reasonable officer would have formed the view, that there had been a loss of tax based on the information available. Therefore, the subjective and objective grounds on which to make a discovery assessment under section 29 TMA 1970 were satisfied.
- Heading
- JUDGE RUPERT JONES Introduction
- The application for permission to appeal to the UT
- UT’s jurisdiction in relation to appeals from the FTT
- The grounds of appeal
- Discussion, Analysis and Decision
- Ground (a)-(c)
- Ground (d)
- Ground (e)-(g)
- Ground (h)
- Ground (i) and (j)
- Grounds (k) and (l)
- The CGT appeal
- Further grounds from the speaking note / oral submissions
- Conclusion to the speaking note and fresh evidence application and grounds
- Problems with the bundle rendering the hearing procedurally unfair
- Conclusions
![[2024] UKUT 00436 (TCC)](https://backend.juristeca.com/files/emisores/logo_ICfrj4g.png)