Discussion: the factors identified as relevant by the FTT
Discussion: the factors identified as relevant by the FTT
Having directed itself as to the applicable principles, the FTT then stated at FTT[134] “With these precepts in mind, the factors in the present case relevant to my consideration at the third stage of the RMC test are as follows”. The FTT then set out twelve factors. Although it is not made explicit in the decision, it is apparent from the discussion of those factors and also from its subsequent conclusion (that IR35 did not apply notwithstanding that mutuality and control were present) that the FTT considered that each of these twelve factors suggested or supported a conclusion that the hypothetical contract would not have been one of employment.
We now consider whether each of the twelve factors was, as matter of principle, indicative or supportive of a conclusion that the hypothetical contract would not have been one of employment.
- Heading
- Introduction
- THE LEGISLATION AND THE ISSUE BEFORE THE FTT
- THE APPROACH TO DETERMINING WHETHER THE INTERMEDIARIES LEGISLATION APPLIES
- background facts
- the ftt’s decision
- grounds of appeal
- ground 1: right of first call
- Basis of appeal
- Significance of issue
- Arguments of the parties
- Discussion
- ground 2: the third rmc stage
- HMRC’s appeal
- Arguments of the parties
- Nature of HMRC’s challenge
- FTT’s self-direction
- Discussion: the factors identified as relevant by the FTT
- Factors (1) and (2)
- Factor (3)
- Factors (4), (5) and (9)
- Factor (6)
- Factor (7)
- Factor (8)
- Factor (10)
- Factor (11)
- Factor (12)
- Conclusions
![UT/2023/000068 - [2024] UKUT 00262 (TCC)](https://backend.juristeca.com/files/emisores/logo_ICfrj4g.png)