![AC-2025-LON-000036 - [2025] EWHC 2701 (Admin)](https://backend.juristeca.com/files/emisores/logo_fi51A75.png){kind=logo}
Conclusions
Conclusion
I find that this appeal was not brought within the requirements of the Practice Direction to CPR part 54 and is therefore not before the court.
Even if the appeal had been brought properly this is not an appeal that can succeed and permission is refused.
- Heading
- HHJ KAREN WALDEN-SMITH SITTING AS A JUDGE OF THE HIGH COURT
- The Factual Background
- Procedural Matters
- Content of the Late Witness Statements
- Skeleton Argument
- The Applicant’s Contentions
- The Enforcement Notice
- The Grounds
- Flooding
- Ground 1
- Ground 2
- Ground 3
- Ground 4
- Biodiversity
- Protected Species
- Conclusions