Background
Background
Grenfell Tower Fire and Inquiry
On 14 June 2017, a fire destroyed Grenfell Tower. Seventy-Two people lost their lives in the fire. The first report of the Inquiry, published on 30 October 2019 (“Phase 1 report”), concluded that the defining factor in the rapid and all-consuming spread of the fire was the presence of combustible materials in the cladding installed during the refurbishment of Grenfell Tower in 2014 to 2016. The Phase 1 report also considered a host of other defects which accelerated the rate of spread.
Several current and former employees of Rydon Maintenance gave oral evidence during Modules 1 and 2 of Phase 2 of the Inquiry. That evidence raised concerns as to, amongst other things, Rydon Maintenance’s approach to building safety. The eventual findings in the second report of the Inquiry, published on 4 September 2024 (“Phase 2 report”), included the following:
“We consider that the principal contractor, Rydon, also bears considerable responsibility for the fire. It gave inadequate thought to fire safety, to which it displayed a casual attitude throughout the project and its systems for managing the design work did not ensure that its sub-contractors and consultants properly understood their different responsibilities. Rydon itself did not understand where responsibility for individual decisions lay and as a result it failed to co-ordinate the design work properly.”
- Heading
- Introduction
- Background
- Background to the contract between Rydon and the SoS (“ the Contract ”)
- Building Safety Act 2022 and RAS Regulations
- Relevant contractual provisions
- Rydon enters into Contract and joins RAS
- The process leading to the Decisions
- Since the decisions
- Agreed List of Issues
- Amenability to and Scope of Judicial Review
- Amenability - Discussion
- Ground 1 – Breach of Natural Justice
- Ground 1 – Discussion
- Ground 2 – Breach of Tameside duty
- Ground 2 - Submissions
- Ground 2 - Discussion
- Ground 3 – Failure to take account of Material Considerations
- Ground 3 - Discussion
- Grounds 4 & 5 – Predetermination / Improper Motive
- Ground 6 – Wednesbury irrationality / Failure to provide reasons
- Conclusions
![AC-2024-LON-0001595 - [2025] EWHC 2182 (Admin)](https://backend.juristeca.com/files/emisores/logo_fi51A75.png)