![[2025] EWHC 2674 (Ch)](https://backend.juristeca.com/files/emisores/logo_O3rEzCI.png){kind=logo}
Conclusion
Conclusion
For these reasons, I agree with the decision of the Judge that the Appellants cannot challenge the amounts paid to Mr Ridgley by way of remuneration and expenses for the realisation of the Land under Rule 18.34.
- Heading
- This is an appeal against an Order of ICC Judge Greenwood dated 28 November 2024 (“ the Judge ”) which dismissed the Appellants’ challenge to the Respondent’s (“ Mr Ridgley ”s) remuneration and expens
- The background
- Ground 1: The scope of r.18.34 and Pt 18 of the 2016 Rules
- Two contextual matters
- The status of secured assets in a liquidation or administration
- The law relating to fiduciary obligations
- Part 18 of the 2016 Rules
- Part 18
- Arguments from consequence
- Conclusion
- Ground 2
- Ground 3
- Conclusions