![[2025] EWHC 2674 (Ch)](https://backend.juristeca.com/files/emisores/logo_O3rEzCI.png){kind=logo}
Two contextual matters
Two contextual matters
Before turning to the construction of the 2016 Rules, each counsel laid particular emphasis on what they submitted was a relevant context when determining the meaning of Rule 18.34.
- Heading
- This is an appeal against an Order of ICC Judge Greenwood dated 28 November 2024 (“ the Judge ”) which dismissed the Appellants’ challenge to the Respondent’s (“ Mr Ridgley ”s) remuneration and expens
- The background
- Ground 1: The scope of r.18.34 and Pt 18 of the 2016 Rules
- Two contextual matters
- The status of secured assets in a liquidation or administration
- The law relating to fiduciary obligations
- Part 18 of the 2016 Rules
- Part 18
- Arguments from consequence
- Conclusion
- Ground 2
- Ground 3
- Conclusions