Juristeca
Juristeca País
    [2025] EWHC 2674 (Ch)
    Chancery Division of the High Court

    [2025] EWHC 2674 (Ch)

    Fecha: 17-Oct-2025

    Conclusions

    Conclusion

    88.

    For these reasons, which are substantially the same as those given by the Judge in his learned and careful judgment, the appeal is dismissed. I have only set out my reasons at such length to do justice to the high quality of argument I received from both sides.

    • Heading
    • This is an appeal against an Order of ICC Judge Greenwood dated 28 November 2024 (“ the Judge ”) which dismissed the Appellants’ challenge to the Respondent’s (“ Mr Ridgley ”s) remuneration and expens
    • The background
    • Ground 1: The scope of r.18.34 and Pt 18 of the 2016 Rules
    • Two contextual matters
    • The status of secured assets in a liquidation or administration
    • The law relating to fiduciary obligations
    • Part 18 of the 2016 Rules
    • Part 18
    • Arguments from consequence
    • Conclusion
    • Ground 2
    • Ground 3
    • Conclusions

    Otros enlaces de interés:

    Jurisprudencia clasificada por bienes e inmuebles Jurisprudencia clasificada por contravención de las normas jurídicas Jurisprudencia clasificada por derechos de la unión europea Jurisprudencia clasificada por derechos fundamentales Jurisprudencia clasificada por materias del derecho Jurisprudencia clasificada por profesiones Jurisprudencia clasificada por sector agrario Jurisprudencia clasificada por sectores de la sociedad

    Síguenos en

    Políticas de eliminación | Políticas de privacidad

    © 2026 Juristeca