Conclusions
Conclusion
For these reasons, which are substantially the same as those given by the Judge in his learned and careful judgment, the appeal is dismissed. I have only set out my reasons at such length to do justice to the high quality of argument I received from both sides.
- Heading
- This is an appeal against an Order of ICC Judge Greenwood dated 28 November 2024 (“ the Judge ”) which dismissed the Appellants’ challenge to the Respondent’s (“ Mr Ridgley ”s) remuneration and expens
- The background
- Ground 1: The scope of r.18.34 and Pt 18 of the 2016 Rules
- Two contextual matters
- The status of secured assets in a liquidation or administration
- The law relating to fiduciary obligations
- Part 18 of the 2016 Rules
- Part 18
- Arguments from consequence
- Conclusion
- Ground 2
- Ground 3
- Conclusions
![[2025] EWHC 2674 (Ch)](https://backend.juristeca.com/files/emisores/logo_O3rEzCI.png)