D.1 The SFA
D.1 The SFA
Section 81 of the Apprenticeships, Skills, Children and Learning Act 2009 (“the 2009 Act”) created the statutory office of Chief Executive of Skills Funding, who was appointed by and answerable to the Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills. The Chief Executive had statutory responsibility for regulating apprenticeship training in England and in doing so was supported by the SFA, an executive agency which was established in 2010.
Section 100 of the 2009 Act, empowered the Chief Executive amongst other things, to secure the provision of financial resources to persons providing education or training by way of apprenticeships. About £1 billion of public money per year was administered by the SFA for this purpose.
The statutory office of Chief Executive was abolished on 26 May 2015, with the SFA continuing as an agency of the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills until July 2016, when it became an agency of the Department for Education. The SFA was abolished on 31 March 2017, its functions being transferred to the Education and Skills Funding Agency (“ESFA”), an executive agency within the Department of Education. The ESFA itself was abolished in April 2025.
Sir Peter was the Chief Executive, and head of the SFA and then the ESFA, between October 2014 and November 2017, when he was replaced by Eileen Milner. The Defendant has accepted that she is liable for the acts and omissions of the SFA and ESFA.
- Heading
- Introduction
- B. The witnesses
- Expert evidence of Vivian Cohen
- C.2 The relevant principles
- C.3 The facts of this case
- C.4 Decision
- D.1 The SFA
- D.2 Carter & Carter
- D.3 The Company and the Funding Agreement
- D.4 2015: The proposed Inflexion acquisiton, Information Memorandum and Baker Tilly report
- D.5 Appointment of Sir Peter Lauener
- D.6 Nick Linford and FE Week
- D.7 2016: The Apprenticeship Levy and proposed Non-Levy Cap
- D.8 Autumn/Winter 2016: The Trilantic Acquisition
- D.9 December 2016: The ‘blood pressure’ email
- D.10 The 13 December 2016 meeting
- D.11 December 2016 – January 2017: The Decision Letter and aftermath
- D.12 Further attempts to sell the business
- D.13 2017-2018: Emergence of irregularities in 3AAA’s records
- E. Misfeasance in public office
- E.2 The pleaded claim
- E.3 Targeted malice - a specific intent to injure
- E.4 Discussion – targeted malice
- E.5 Discussion - untargeted malice
- F. The claim in negligence
- F.1 A duty of care
- F.2 Pure economic loss
- F.3 Assumption of responsibility
- F.4 Communications crossing the line
- F.5 The task
- F.6 A White v Jones lacuna
- F.7 Conclusion on duty of care
- G. Loss
- H.1 “Net Cash Consideration”
- H.2 Value of Claimants’ shares in December 2016
- H.3 The significance of data manipulation
- Conclusions
![BL-2022-002117 - [2025] EWHC 2794 (Ch)](https://backend.juristeca.com/files/emisores/logo_O3rEzCI.png)