Case No. CL-2019-000290
Commercial Court

Case No. CL-2019-000290

Fecha: 14-Feb-2020

The relevant arbitration and jurisdiction agreements

9.The SpA, under which the various instalments of the price for the 20% interest in Heritage were payable, provided by clause 11.2: “The Parties submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales as regards any claim, dispute or matter (whether contractual or non-contractual) arising out of or in connection with this agreement (including its formation)”. 10.In the circumstances which I have summarised above, in January 2019 Albion, EIGL and Mr Buckingham (but not the other three parties to the SpA) entered into the Escrow Agreement. This referred to the various claims asserted by Heritage and EIGL against Albion and Mr Buckingham, and by Albion against EIGL for the outstanding $13.3m. There were then a series of promises: i)by EIGL to pay the outstanding $13.3m into escrow; ii)by Albion, Mr Buckingham and EIGL not to instruct Charles Fussell & Co LLP to act other than in accordance with the undertaking it was giving as to the terms on which the Escrow Amount was held; iii)by Mr Buckingham to provide certain responses to queries which Heritage and EIGL had raised; iv) by EIGL to provide certain information to Mr Buckingham; v) by EIGL, Albion and Mr Buckingham, if there remained outstanding disputes after 1 March 2019, to use reasonable endeavours promptly to agree an appropriate dispute resolution procedure to resolve them, and not to commence proceedings in relation to the disputed matters prior to 1 April 2019. 11.Clauses 2.8 and 2.9 involved agreements by all parties that the transfer of funds into the Escrow Account was “entirely without prejudice to the legal rights and position” of those parties, including, in the case of Albion, “the legal rights and position … in respect of any and all claims arising as a result of EIGL’s alleged failure to comply with the terms of the [SpA] and/or any other rights which Albion … may have under the [SpA] or otherwise”. 12.Finally, and most materially for present purposes, clause 6 provided: “Any dispute or difference (whether contractual or non-contractual) arising out of or in connection with this letter (including any question regarding its existence, validity, interpretation performance or termination) shall be referred to and finally settled by arbitration in accordance with the Rules of Arbitration of the International Chamber of Commerce by three arbitrators appointed in accordance with the said Rules. The place of arbitration shall be London, England and the language of the arbitral procedure shall be English”. 13.It was Mr Morpuss QC’s submission for EIGL that the arbitration clause in the Escrow Agreement (“the Arbitration Agreement”) had varied and supplanted the High Court jurisdiction clause in the SpA (“the Jurisdiction Agreement”) so far as the claim to the outstanding $13.3m was concerned.