Case No. CL-2019-000290

v HSH Nordbank AG [2009] EWCA Civ 585 at [83] and Deutsche Bank AG v Sebastian Holdings Inc [2010] EWCA Civ 998 at [42]. 19.Finally, it may be apparent from the nature of the agreement in which a particular dispute resolution provision is located that it is intended to have a narrower scope and is principally concerned with disputes of a particular kind. I note that the Court of Appeal in UBS AG rejected the contention that the English jurisdiction clause in the Kiel notes extended to the parties’ overarching dispute because it was a “`boilerplate’ bond issue jurisdiction clause … primarily intended to deal with technical banking disputes” ([89]). The scope of a dispute resolution provision in an escrow agreement which is in different terms to that contained within the associated principal contract has been considered in at least two cases. In