![CA-2024-001949 & CA-2024-001935 - [2025] EWCA Civ 1212](https://backend.juristeca.com/files/emisores/logo_Sjvxvlx.png){kind=logo}
Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
CA-2024-001949 & CA-2024-001935 - [2025] EWCA Civ 1212
Fecha: 02-Oct-2025
The issues on the appeal
The issues on the appeal
In these circumstances, it seems to me that the issues arising on the supply contract appeal, and the logical order in which they should be addressed, are as follows:
Was Uniserve entitled to rescind the supply contract for misrepresentation? If not:
Was Uniserve entitled to terminate the supply contract? If not:
Was Hitex entitled to damages for non-acceptance of the goods? If so:
Was the judge wrong to assess damages as he did?
- Heading
- LORD JUSTICE MALES
- The parties
- Background
- The Supply Contract
- The Commission Contract
- Performance of the contract
- Hitex’s claim
- The judgment
- The grounds of appeal
- Deciding a case on grounds not argued
- The issues on the appeal
- Was Uniserve entitled to rescind the supply contract for misrepresentation?
- Was Uniserve entitled to terminate the supply contract?
- Was Hitex entitled to damages for non-acceptance of the goods?
- Was the judge wrong to assess damages as he did?
- Conclusions