Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
CA-2024-001949 & CA-2024-001935 - [2025] EWCA Civ 1212
Fecha: 02-Oct-2025
Was the judge wrong to assess damages as he did?
Was the judge wrong to assess damages as he did?
In view of my conclusion so far, the question whether the judge was wrong to assess damages as he did does not arise and, as this issue received relatively little attention at the hearing of the appeal, I prefer to say nothing about it.
- Heading
- LORD JUSTICE MALES
- The parties
- Background
- The Supply Contract
- The Commission Contract
- Performance of the contract
- Hitex’s claim
- The judgment
- The grounds of appeal
- Deciding a case on grounds not argued
- The issues on the appeal
- Was Uniserve entitled to rescind the supply contract for misrepresentation?
- Was Uniserve entitled to terminate the supply contract?
- Was Hitex entitled to damages for non-acceptance of the goods?
- Was the judge wrong to assess damages as he did?
- Conclusions