Juristeca
Juristeca País
    CA-2024-001949 & CA-2024-001935 - [2025] EWCA Civ 1212
    Court of Appeal (Civil Division)

    CA-2024-001949 & CA-2024-001935 - [2025] EWCA Civ 1212

    Fecha: 02-Oct-2025

    Was the judge wrong to assess damages as he did?

    Was the judge wrong to assess damages as he did?

    95.

    In view of my conclusion so far, the question whether the judge was wrong to assess damages as he did does not arise and, as this issue received relatively little attention at the hearing of the appeal, I prefer to say nothing about it.

    • Heading
    • LORD JUSTICE MALES
    • The parties
    • Background
    • The Supply Contract
    • The Commission Contract
    • Performance of the contract
    • Hitex’s claim
    • The judgment
    • The grounds of appeal
    • Deciding a case on grounds not argued
    • The issues on the appeal
    • Was Uniserve entitled to rescind the supply contract for misrepresentation?
    • Was Uniserve entitled to terminate the supply contract?
    • Was Hitex entitled to damages for non-acceptance of the goods?
    • Was the judge wrong to assess damages as he did?
    • Conclusions

    Otros enlaces de interés:

    Jurisprudencia clasificada por bienes e inmuebles Jurisprudencia clasificada por contravención de las normas jurídicas Jurisprudencia clasificada por derechos de la unión europea Jurisprudencia clasificada por derechos fundamentales Jurisprudencia clasificada por materias del derecho Jurisprudencia clasificada por profesiones Jurisprudencia clasificada por sector agrario Jurisprudencia clasificada por sectores de la sociedad

    Síguenos en

    Políticas de eliminación | Políticas de privacidad

    © 2026 Juristeca