CA-2024-001949 & CA-2024-001935 - [2025] EWCA Civ 1212
Court of Appeal (Civil Division)

CA-2024-001949 & CA-2024-001935 - [2025] EWCA Civ 1212

Fecha: 02-Oct-2025

The Supply Contract

The Supply Contract

15.

Although dated 21st April 2020, the Supply Contract was signed on behalf of Hitex on 23rd April and by Uniserve on 23rd or 24th April, only after Majlan had reported the results of its inspection on 23rd April. It provided for the supply of 80 million ‘Type IIR Surgical Disposable Fluid Resistant Masks’, in accordance with an attached specification, packed in cartons containing 50 boxes with each box containing 50 masks, for delivery ex works, to be collected from Hitex’s factory in Jordan. The price was US $0.30 per mask.

16.

The agreed delivery schedule was as follows:

Date

Quantity of masks

28th April

6 million

5th May

5 million

12th May

5 million

19th May

5 million

26th May

5 million

2nd June

7 million

9th June

7 million

16th June

7 million

23rd June

7 million

30th June

7 million

7th July

7 million

14th July

7 million

21st July

5 million

17.

The contract provided that the dates for delivery were of the essence, meaning that Uniserve would be entitled to terminate the contract (and, if appropriate, claim damages) if any of the delivery dates were not met. However, while time was of the essence as regards Hitex’s obligation to have the masks ready for delivery, it was not of the essence as regards Uniserve’s obligation to collect the masks on the stated delivery dates.

18.

The contract also contained an entire agreement clause excluding liability for non-fraudulent pre-contractual representations.

19.

The contract was expressly governed by the law of England and Wales.