![CA-2025-001079 & CA-2025-002078 - [2025] EWCA Civ 1262](https://backend.juristeca.com/files/emisores/logo_Sjvxvlx.png){kind=logo}
Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
CA-2025-001079 & CA-2025-002078 - [2025] EWCA Civ 1262
Fecha: 07-Oct-2025
Conclusions
Conclusion
If my Lords agree, for the reasons that I have given, I would allow Google’s appeal and dismiss Mr Robertson’s cross-appeal.
LORD JUSTICE DINGEMANS, SENIOR PRESIDENT OF TRIBUNALS:
I agree.
LORD JUSTICE UNDERHILL:
I also agree.
- Heading
- LORD JUSTICE COULSON
- The Factual Background
- The Relevant Parts of the CPR
- serve a copy of that notice with the claim form
- within the period specified by rule 7.5; or
- the court has failed to serve the claim form; or
- The Judge’s Judgment
- The Precise Nature of the Default and the Remedy Available
- Rule 6.34
- Google’s Appeal: The Applicability of Rule 7.6
- Is Mr Robertson Entitled to an Extension Under r.7.6?
- The New Point
- Mr Robertson’s Cross-Appeal
- Conclusions