Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
CA-2025-001079 & CA-2025-002078 - [2025] EWCA Civ 1262
Fecha: 07-Oct-2025
Is Mr Robertson Entitled to an Extension Under r.7.6?
Is Mr Robertson Entitled to an Extension Under r.7.6?
Mr Boch accepted that Mr Robertson is unable to meet the applicable test in r.7.6(3). That is expressly conceded in paragraph 4 of his appeal skeleton argument. On the face of it, therefore, and subject to the new point, addressed below, I would allow Google’s appeal.
- Heading
- LORD JUSTICE COULSON
- The Factual Background
- The Relevant Parts of the CPR
- serve a copy of that notice with the claim form
- within the period specified by rule 7.5; or
- the court has failed to serve the claim form; or
- The Judge’s Judgment
- The Precise Nature of the Default and the Remedy Available
- Rule 6.34
- Google’s Appeal: The Applicability of Rule 7.6
- Is Mr Robertson Entitled to an Extension Under r.7.6?
- The New Point
- Mr Robertson’s Cross-Appeal
- Conclusions