Ground 3
Ground 3
As we have already said, the Judge’s analysis was, if anything, favourable to the Secretary of State. The Judge would have been entitled to give the policy articulated in the Treaty no weight at all. For the reasons which we have already given, it did not entitle the Secretary of State to repudiate the lawful offer of an opportunity to request a reconsideration of the decision which, by issuing the statutory guidance in the terms in which it then was, she had authorised her own expert officials to make, and which, acting in accordance with the statutory guidance, they had duly made.
- Heading
- Lord Justice Arnold, Lord Justice Lewis and Lady Justice Elisabeth Laing
- The facts
- The Competent Authority’s decision
- CTK’s challenge to his removal
- The hearing and the judgment
- The grounds of appeal
- The legal background
- The relevant domestic provisions about trafficking
- The two treaties
- Introduction to our consideration of the grounds of appeal
- Discussion
- The grounds of appeal
- Ground 2
- Ground 3
- Ground 4
- Is there another compelling reason for giving permission to appeal?
- Conclusions
![CA-2025-002338 - [2025] EWCA Civ 1264](https://backend.juristeca.com/files/emisores/logo_Sjvxvlx.png)