Ground 4
Ground 4
The premise of ground 4 is that the Judge was entitled, in the order, to suspend CTK’s removal until CTK had, within a specified period, made a request for reconsideration. The period for that which is allowed both in the statutory guidance and in the decision was 30 days. The Judge significantly shortened that period (in the first instance, to 14 days). The argument that the Judge was irrational to require CTK to use his best endeavours to make that application within that significantly shorter period is hopeless. We need say no more about it.
- Heading
- Lord Justice Arnold, Lord Justice Lewis and Lady Justice Elisabeth Laing
- The facts
- The Competent Authority’s decision
- CTK’s challenge to his removal
- The hearing and the judgment
- The grounds of appeal
- The legal background
- The relevant domestic provisions about trafficking
- The two treaties
- Introduction to our consideration of the grounds of appeal
- Discussion
- The grounds of appeal
- Ground 2
- Ground 3
- Ground 4
- Is there another compelling reason for giving permission to appeal?
- Conclusions
![CA-2025-002338 - [2025] EWCA Civ 1264](https://backend.juristeca.com/files/emisores/logo_Sjvxvlx.png)