Works on premises in Leicester
Works on premises in Leicester
We can deal with this shortly. 3KH claimed to be entitled to deduct the VAT incurred on the redevelopment of the property from which TSL operated. It was contended that despite the assertion that RM/AN operated TSL the VAT on development costs had been incurred with the intention that 3KH would operate TSL. This claim was pursued even in respect of costs incurred after the date on which the documents referred to in paragraphs 51 (loan) and 52 (franchise agreement) above were signed.
Officer Beard accepted that 3KH was entitled to recover the VAT incurred on the premise that he was also of the view that TSL was operated by 3KH. We have determined that on the evidence TSL was operated by 3KH and accordingly, the assessments allow this input tax in full.
- Heading
- Introduction
- Brief factual and procedural background
- Burden of Proof
- Evidence
- Parties submission
- Findings of fact
- Evidence
- Parties submissions
- Findings of fact
- Best Judgement Issue
- Evidence
- Parties submissions
- Findings of fact
- VAT Quantum Issue
- Parties submissions
- Evidence
- Input Tax Issue
- Discussion
- Works on premises in Leicester
- 7 Wilmslow Road
- Vehicle hire invoices
- Birmingham Hotels invoices
- Discovery Issue
- Findings of fact
- Deliberate issue
- Parties submissions
- Findings of fact
- Participation Issue
- PLN Issue
- Findings of Fact
- Mitigation Issue
- Parties submissions
- Findings of fact
- Conclusions
![TC09555 - [2025] UKFTT 00748 (TC)](https://backend.juristeca.com/files/emisores/logo_7HSuEAV.png)