Case No. EWHC-1798-(IPEC)
Intellectual Property Enterprise Court

Case No. EWHC-1798-(IPEC)

Fecha: 13-Jul-2022

Mr Clarke found out in about March 2018 that some of the European gigs were more lucrative than he previously believed.

259.Mr Richardson’s written evidence, which has not been challenged on this point, is that Mr Williams confirmed in March 2018 that AWEL had been charging more for performances than he had previously told Mr Clarke or Mr Richardson. However, Mr Richardson is clear that Mr Clarke had been in discussions with agents and promotors about the costs of booking the Claimants’ band and had been insisting for around a year that the fees being charged were higher than he had been told.260.Mr Clarke’s evidence is that before the meeting in March 2018:“I had taken the time to speak to a number of promoters and venues who had told me that the prices for TRFAW were not what I had originally believed.”261.In the light of the evidence, I do not accept that the fact as stated by the Claimants has been proved.(iii)