![Case Nos: IP-2023-000039 and IP-2023-000132 - [2024] EWHC 2889 (IPEC)](https://backend.juristeca.com/files/emisores/logo_AacSvIO.png){kind=logo}
Intellectual Property Enterprise Court
Case Nos: IP-2023-000039 and IP-2023-000132 - [2024] EWHC 2889 (IPEC)
Fecha: 15-Nov-2024
Currentbody’s arguments in the ISD Claim
Currentbody’s arguments in the ISD Claim
Because I am not satisfied that ISD’s arguments are sufficiently strong, there will be no summary judgment in the ISD Claim. However, Currentbody had further independent arguments for resisting summary judgment even if one or more of ISD’s arguments would have led to a summary finding.
- Heading
- Background
- The claims
- The Kaiyan Claim
- Order of 18 January 2024
- Strike out / Summary judgment
- The law
- Contractual interpretation
- The NDA
- ISD’s grounds for summary judgment in the ISD Claim
- The Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999
- The expiry of the NDA
- Construction of clause 3(1)
- Currentbody’s arguments in the ISD Claim
- The purpose of clause 2(5)
- Generally known
- Discussion
- The arguments in the Kaiyan Claim
- Discussion
- Conclusions