![Case Nos: IP-2023-000039 and IP-2023-000132 - [2024] EWHC 2889 (IPEC)](https://backend.juristeca.com/files/emisores/logo_AacSvIO.png){kind=logo}
Intellectual Property Enterprise Court
Case Nos: IP-2023-000039 and IP-2023-000132 - [2024] EWHC 2889 (IPEC)
Fecha: 15-Nov-2024
ISD’s grounds for summary judgment in the ISD Claim
ISD’s grounds for summary judgment in the ISD Claim
ISD had broadly three reasons in support of its contention that Currentbody’s counterclaim based on ISM’s or ISD’s alleged breach of clause 2.5 of the NDA must fail.
- Heading
- Background
- The claims
- The Kaiyan Claim
- Order of 18 January 2024
- Strike out / Summary judgment
- The law
- Contractual interpretation
- The NDA
- ISD’s grounds for summary judgment in the ISD Claim
- The Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999
- The expiry of the NDA
- Construction of clause 3(1)
- Currentbody’s arguments in the ISD Claim
- The purpose of clause 2(5)
- Generally known
- Discussion
- The arguments in the Kaiyan Claim
- Discussion
- Conclusions