![QB-2022-001364 - [2025] EWHC 2758 (KB)](https://backend.juristeca.com/files/emisores/logo_AJKZXmE.png){kind=logo}
King's / Queen's Bench Division of the High Court
QB-2022-001364 - [2025] EWHC 2758 (KB)
Fecha: 30-Oct-2025
As a matter of law does Edge have an actionable claim in damages in relation to the breaches of statutory duty which it alleges?
As a matter of law does Edge have an actionable claim in damages in relation to the breaches of statutory duty which it alleges?
I will deal with this issue first as the bulk of the hearing was taken up with the arguments in relation to it.
- Heading
- Introduction
- The factual and legal context for the claims
- Edge’s pleaded claim in these proceedings
- As a matter of law does Edge have an actionable claim in damages in relation to the breaches of statutory duty which it alleges?
- The broad issues under this heading
- Mr Strickland’s first submission in greater detail
- Discussion and conclusion on Mr Strickland’s first argument
- The principles applicable to determining whether there is a right to claim damages for breach of section 8(4) of the WTA 2006
- Edge’s argument
- Discussion
- Are the claims or either of them time-barred?
- Section 2 of the Limitation Act 1980
- When were the claims “brought”?
- Edge’s case on limitation
- Ofcom’s case on limitation
- Discussion and conclusion
- Conclusions