![QB-2022-001364 - [2025] EWHC 2758 (KB)](https://backend.juristeca.com/files/emisores/logo_AJKZXmE.png){kind=logo}
King's / Queen's Bench Division of the High Court
QB-2022-001364 - [2025] EWHC 2758 (KB)
Fecha: 30-Oct-2025
Conclusions
Conclusion
Accordingly, I propose to dismiss Edge’s claims on the grounds that it does not have an actionable claim in damages for the breaches of section 8(4) of the WTA 2006 which it alleges.
- Heading
- Introduction
- The factual and legal context for the claims
- Edge’s pleaded claim in these proceedings
- As a matter of law does Edge have an actionable claim in damages in relation to the breaches of statutory duty which it alleges?
- The broad issues under this heading
- Mr Strickland’s first submission in greater detail
- Discussion and conclusion on Mr Strickland’s first argument
- The principles applicable to determining whether there is a right to claim damages for breach of section 8(4) of the WTA 2006
- Edge’s argument
- Discussion
- Are the claims or either of them time-barred?
- Section 2 of the Limitation Act 1980
- When were the claims “brought”?
- Edge’s case on limitation
- Ofcom’s case on limitation
- Discussion and conclusion
- Conclusions