QB-2022-001364 - [2025] EWHC 2758 (KB)
King's / Queen's Bench Division of the High Court

QB-2022-001364 - [2025] EWHC 2758 (KB)

Fecha: 30-Oct-2025

Discussion and conclusion

Discussion and conclusion

78.

I agree with Mr Strickland that in this context “make” means “bring into effect”. The case against Ofcom is that section 8(4) required Ofcom, through the exercise of its power to make regulations, to ensure that Edge was exempt from the requirement to obtain a licence for the relevant purposes. That state of affairs could only be brought about by regulations being brought into effect, and it would only be at that point that the breach of duty came to an end. The word “make” in section 8(4) appears as part of the phrase “they must make regulations under subsection (3) exempting the establishment, installation and use of a station or apparatus of that description from subsection (1)” and I agree with Mr Strickland that, for the purposes of section 2 of the Limitation Act 1980, this duty was not discharged until any regulations which were made actually did exempt the relevant apparatus etc. I do not accept that Parliament can have intended that Ofcom could discharge its duty by making regulations under section 8(4) but not bringing them into effect.

79.

On this basis, both claims are in my view in time.