KB-2024-001295 - [2025] EWHC 3000 (KB)
Fecha: 14-Nov-2025
(a): The nature of the Property itself
(a): The nature of the Property itself
The convenience of cryptocurrency as a method of money laundering arises out of its nature. The Claimant cited open source material from the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime to the effect that (i) cryptocurrencies are anonymous at their point of creation, such that the “placement” stage of the money laundering process is often absent; (ii) it only takes a few seconds to create a free account and it is only possible to use each account twice: to receive money and then transfer it elsewhere; (iii) it is possible to create a large money laundering scheme with thousands of transfers at a low cost and to execute it using a computer script; and (iv) due to rapid increases in exchange rates, with some cryptocurrencies showing 10,000% growth, it is very easy to justify unexpected wealth through cryptocurrencies.
- Heading
- Introduction
- The evidence
- The factual background in overview
- (ii): D2 and D3
- More detail on the source of the funds in the accounts
- The legal framework
- The procedural history prior to the 9 June 2025 hearing
- The Case Management Conference (“CMC”) on 18 March 2025
- Events between the CMC and 9 June 2025
- The 9 June 2025 hearing
- Proceeding in the absence of D2 and D3
- Service of the hearing papers on D1
- Events after the 9 June 2025 hearing
- The 11 November 2025 hearing
- Analysis and decision
- (ii): The location of the Property
- (iii): “Recoverable property”
- (a): The nature of the Property itself
- (b): The way the Property is held
- (c): Additional efforts undertaken to conceal the origin of the Property and its connection to the D1
- (d): The US offences
- (f): The lack of any evidence in response to the Claimant’s case
- Conclusions