KB-2024-001295 - [2025] EWHC 3000 (KB)
Fecha: 14-Nov-2025
(ii): The location of the Property
(ii): The location of the Property
POCA, s.282A(1) provides that the court may make a recovery order in respect of property wherever situated, and in respect of a person wherever present. The Property in this case is held by financial institutions that have a presence in the UK, but it is not entirely clear where the Property is held.
Assuming that the Property is held outside of the UK, s.282A(2) applies. This provides that in order to make a recovery order in respect of property that is outside the [UK] there must be a “connection between the case and England the relevant part of the [UK]”.
By s.282A(3), the nature of the connection required is described in schedule 7A of POCA. By para. 5 of schedule 7A the connection is satisfied where a person whose conduct was part of the unlawful conduct, or who holds the property in question, is linked to the relevant part of the UK.
The “link” includes being a British citizen, or a person domiciled, resident or present in the relevant part of the UK.
In this case, D1, D2 and D3 are all British citizens. D2 and D3 currently appear to be present in England and Wales. D1 was in England at some point between 13 April 2025 (when he arrived at Heathrow, having been removed from the US) and 7/8 June 2025 (by which point he was in Spain).
- Heading
- Introduction
- The evidence
- The factual background in overview
- (ii): D2 and D3
- More detail on the source of the funds in the accounts
- The legal framework
- The procedural history prior to the 9 June 2025 hearing
- The Case Management Conference (“CMC”) on 18 March 2025
- Events between the CMC and 9 June 2025
- The 9 June 2025 hearing
- Proceeding in the absence of D2 and D3
- Service of the hearing papers on D1
- Events after the 9 June 2025 hearing
- The 11 November 2025 hearing
- Analysis and decision
- (ii): The location of the Property
- (iii): “Recoverable property”
- (a): The nature of the Property itself
- (b): The way the Property is held
- (c): Additional efforts undertaken to conceal the origin of the Property and its connection to the D1
- (d): The US offences
- (f): The lack of any evidence in response to the Claimant’s case
- Conclusions