KB-2024-001295 - [2025] EWHC 3000 (KB)
Fecha: 14-Nov-2025
(d): The US offences
(d): The US offences
D1 has admitted his involvement in unlawful conduct through which he obtained cryptocurrency in both the New York and the California proceedings. He accepted obtaining $794,012.64 in cryptocurrency and that the proceeds could not be located by any enforcement authority exercising due diligence. The unlawful conduct which occurred in the US would plainly amount to unlawful conduct in England and Wales, had it occurred here, namely (i) unauthorised access to computer material, contrary to the Computer Misuse Act 1990, s.1; (ii) fraud, contrary to the Fraud Act 2006, s.2 and (iii) money laundering offences, contrary to POCA, ss.327, 328 or 329.
(e): The lack of any lawful income for D1
There is no information available as to how D1 could lawfully have obtained this amount of cryptocurrency.
- Heading
- Introduction
- The evidence
- The factual background in overview
- (ii): D2 and D3
- More detail on the source of the funds in the accounts
- The legal framework
- The procedural history prior to the 9 June 2025 hearing
- The Case Management Conference (“CMC”) on 18 March 2025
- Events between the CMC and 9 June 2025
- The 9 June 2025 hearing
- Proceeding in the absence of D2 and D3
- Service of the hearing papers on D1
- Events after the 9 June 2025 hearing
- The 11 November 2025 hearing
- Analysis and decision
- (ii): The location of the Property
- (iii): “Recoverable property”
- (a): The nature of the Property itself
- (b): The way the Property is held
- (c): Additional efforts undertaken to conceal the origin of the Property and its connection to the D1
- (d): The US offences
- (f): The lack of any evidence in response to the Claimant’s case
- Conclusions