![[2025] EWHC 1955 (KB)](https://backend.juristeca.com/files/emisores/logo_AJKZXmE.png){kind=logo}
Order that the Respondent complies with the discovery application file on 12 December 2024
Order that the Respondent complies with the discovery application file on 12 December 2024;
For the reasons I have given, HHJ Humphreys was more than justified in dismissing the application.
Contempt of Court against the Respondent both for lying to the Court and for the Respondent’s Witness aggressive behaviour towards the Appellant during 17 December hearing;
As set out above, there is no basis to conclude that either witness for the Respondent lied to the Court on oath; the Judge certainly came to no such conclusion. The aggressive behaviour of Mr Williams was wholly inappropriate, and was not tolerated by the Court. Mr Williams has since deceased.
- Heading
- Introduction
- The Claim and Counterclaim
- The Judgment
- The Court’s Approach on Appeal
- Grounds Of Appeal
- The Judge was wrong to ignore the Respondent’s threats of physical violence and acts of aggression in the Courtroom towards the Appellant
- The Judge was wrong to find, as he did, the ownership of the contested land
- The Judge was wrong to dismiss the argument that an unincorporated organisation cannot claim adverse possession
- The Judge was wrong to find that there was a claim for adverse possession and in granting adverse possession
- The Judge was wrong to grant an easement under the lost modern act
- The Judge was wrong to ignore the direct testimony of the respondent’s witness statement
- The Judge was wrong to deny harassment and nuisance when the respondent first committed an offence
- Other Complaints
- Paragraphs 5 and 6
- Paragraph 22
- Paragraph 24
- The Additional Grounds of Appeal
- Other Applications
- Order that the Respondent complies with the discovery application file on 12 December 2024
- Conclusions