QB-2022-000174 - [2025] EWHC 1669 (KB)
Fecha: 02-Jul-2025
Further OPEN disclosure
Further OPEN disclosure
Following the hearing on 12 May, the Attorney General has disclosed further documents into OPEN, which make clear that, in the course of a document review in August 2022, inspectors from the Investigatory Powers Commissioner’s Office (“IPCO”) identified a documentary record of the authorisation given to Officer 2 to depart from NCND in relation to X’s CHIS status, if he considered it necessary to do so. Following an investigation, IPCO produced a draft report in February 2023 containing a finding that there had been a departure from NCND in accordance with the authorisation. The Investigatory Powers Commissioner himself expressed the view that there had been a departure from NCND as late as December 2023. However, MI5 responded to IPCO denying any such departure. IPCO was persuaded to alter its conclusions and, in its final report in March 2024, accepted MI5’s assurance that no departure had taken place.
- Heading
- Baroness Carr of Walton-on-the-Hill (Lady Chief Justice of England and Wales), Dame Victoria Sharp (President of the King’s Bench Division) and Mr Justice Chamberlain
- Legal context
- The importance of NCND
- What happened in this case
- Why it mattered whether MI5 had confirmed X’s CHIS status
- How the false evidence came to light
- MI5’s explanations and investigations
- Further OPEN disclosure
- Findings and conclusions Who was misled?
- The unrealistic maintenance of NCND
- The manner in which the court was informed about MI5’s investigations
- The adequacy of the investigations
- Contempt of court
- Corporate witness statements
- Conclusions