QB-2022-000174 - [2025] EWHC 1669 (KB)
Fecha: 02-Jul-2025
Heading

Royal Courts of Justice
Strand, London, WC2A 2LL
Before:
THE LADY CHIEF JUSTICE OF ENGLAND AND WALES
THE PRESIDENT OF THE KING’S BENCH DIVISION
MR JUSTICE CHAMBERLAIN
HM ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR ENGLAND AND WALES | Claimant |
- and - | |
BRITISH BROADCASTING CORPORATION | Defendant |
Case No: AC-2024-LON-02952
And Between:
THE KING on the application of ‘BETH’ | Claimant |
- and - | |
THE INVESTIGATORY POWERS TRIBUNAL - and - THE SECURITY SERVICE | Defendant Interested Party |
Sir James Eadie KC, Neil Sheldon KC, Jennifer Thelen and Emmanuel Sheppard (instructed bythe Treasury Solicitor) for HM Attorney General for England and Wales
Jude Bunting KC (instructed by the BBC Litigation Department) for the British Broadcasting Corporation
Charlotte Kilroy KC, Jesse Nicholls and Isabel Buchanan (instructed by the Centre for Women’s Justice) for Beth
Sarah Hannett KC and Paul Skinner (instructed by the Government Legal Department) for the Investigatory Powers Tribunal
Zubair Ahmad KC and Dominic Lewis (instructed by the Special Advocates’ Support Office) as Special Advocates
Hearing date: 3 June 2025
Approved Judgment
- Heading
- Baroness Carr of Walton-on-the-Hill (Lady Chief Justice of England and Wales), Dame Victoria Sharp (President of the King’s Bench Division) and Mr Justice Chamberlain
- Legal context
- The importance of NCND
- What happened in this case
- Why it mattered whether MI5 had confirmed X’s CHIS status
- How the false evidence came to light
- MI5’s explanations and investigations
- Further OPEN disclosure
- Findings and conclusions Who was misled?
- The unrealistic maintenance of NCND
- The manner in which the court was informed about MI5’s investigations
- The adequacy of the investigations
- Contempt of court
- Corporate witness statements
- Conclusions