King's / Queen's Bench Division of the High Court

KA-2024-BHM-000008 - [2025] EWHC 2093 (KB)

Fecha: 12-Ago-2025

Heading

Neutral Citation Number: [2025] EWHC 2093 (KB)

Case No: KA-2024-BHM-000008

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE

KING’S BENCH DIVISION

BIRMINGHAM DISTRICT REGISTRY

Birmingham Civil & Family Justice Centre

Date: 12 August 2025

Before :

MR JUSTICE CAVANAGH

Between :

Miss Hannah Louise Rawson

Appellant

- and -

TUI U.K. Ltd

Respondent

Ian Pennock (instructed by Aegis Legal) for the Appellant

Dan Saxby (instructed by Kennedys) for the Respondent

Hearing date: 30 July 2025

JUDGMENT

This judgment was handed down remotely at 10.30am on 12 August 2025 by circulation to the parties or their representatives by e-mail and by release to the National Archives.

Heading
Mr Justice Cavanagh
The grounds of appeal
The relevant legal principles
Appeals on findings of fact
Appeals on matters expert evidence
Adequacy of reasons
In Glas SAS itself, Falk LJ said, at paragraph 29
That course of action was not followed in the Glas SAS case. At paragraph 32e, Falk LJ said
The obligation to deal with a point in cross-examination if a party wishes to rely upon it
Permission to appeal
The findings and reasoning of the judge
The evidence and the judge’s findings that are relevant to the cyclospora issue The Appellant’s evidence, as recorded by the judge
The judge’s review of the expert evidence
The judge’s conclusions on the cyclospora issue
The evidence and the judge’s findings that are relevant to the causation issue
The judge’s review of the expert evidence on causation
The judge’s conclusions on causation
The grounds of appeal, and the oral submissions on behalf of the Appellant
Grounds relating to the cyclospora issue
Discussion
Grounds relating to the causation issue
Discussion
Conclusions