KA-2024-BHM-000008 - [2025] EWHC 2093 (KB)

That course of action was not followed in the Glas SAS case. At paragraph 32e, Falk LJ said:

“Importantly, counsel should immediately point out if they consider that reasoning is inadequate. It is regrettable that this was not done in this case. A failure to do so cannot prevent an appeal being made, but it is conduct that might be taken into account by the appellate court in determining the appropriate order for costs, since raising the issue might have resulted in an unnecessary appeal being avoided.”