King's / Queen's Bench Division of the High Court

KA-2024-BHM-000008 - [2025] EWHC 2093 (KB)

Fecha: 12-Ago-2025

The evidence and the judge’s findings that are relevant to the cyclospora issue The Appellant’s evidence, as recorded by the judge

The evidence and the judge’s findings that are relevant to the cyclospora issue

The Appellant’s evidence, as recorded by the judge

The Appellant fell ill on 11 July, three days into her holiday, at about 5 pm. She had explosive diarrhoea, which lasted all night, and she began to vomit. She had a raised temperature. Though she was able to go on some excursions, which she only did because she felt guilty about her partner, the Appellant suffered diarrhoea six or seven times a day whilst in Mexico.

I refer below, when dealing with the causation issue, to the evidence about what the Appellant did on her holiday.

Heading
Mr Justice Cavanagh
The grounds of appeal
The relevant legal principles
Appeals on findings of fact
Appeals on matters expert evidence
Adequacy of reasons
In Glas SAS itself, Falk LJ said, at paragraph 29
That course of action was not followed in the Glas SAS case. At paragraph 32e, Falk LJ said
The obligation to deal with a point in cross-examination if a party wishes to rely upon it
Permission to appeal
The findings and reasoning of the judge
The evidence and the judge’s findings that are relevant to the cyclospora issue The Appellant’s evidence, as recorded by the judge
The judge’s review of the expert evidence
The judge’s conclusions on the cyclospora issue
The evidence and the judge’s findings that are relevant to the causation issue
The judge’s review of the expert evidence on causation
The judge’s conclusions on causation
The grounds of appeal, and the oral submissions on behalf of the Appellant
Grounds relating to the cyclospora issue
Discussion
Grounds relating to the causation issue
Discussion
Conclusions