KB-2023-003636 - [2025] EWHC 2043 (KB)
Fecha: 05-Ago-2025
Conclusions
Outcome
The defendants are each responsible for the article, which conveys the following meaning:
“The claimant is a street agitator who has whipped up a mob on London’s streets, addressed an anti-Israel protest in inflammatory terms, and exacerbated frayed tensions (which had already spilled over into public disorder) between Muslim and Hindu communities in Leicester by whipping up his Muslim followers including by ridiculing Hindus for their belief in re-incarnation and describing Hindus as pathetic, weak and cowardly in comparison to whom he would rather be an animal.”
That meaning is a statement of fact which is defamatory of the claimant at common law. The publication has not caused, and is not now likely to cause, serious harm to the claimant’s reputation. In any event, it is substantially true, and it is not materially inaccurate. The claims are, accordingly, dismissed.
- Heading
- A time limited reporting restriction order is in place to prohibit the reporting of the identity of the man that is referred to in this judgment as CVB. While that restriction is in place, no matter m
- The factual background
- The Hindutva
- Golders Green: Saturday 22 May 2021
- BBC: 23 May 2021
- The rally for Israel: Sunday 23 May 2021
- Seminar on Hinduism at the Sapience Institute: April 2022
- Leicester: May – September 2022
- The claimant’s actions on 18 September 2022
- The article
- Organisations disassociate from the claimant
- The causes of the street violence
- The claimant’s evidence
- The evidence of the claimant’s witnesses
- Tort of defamation
- Responsibility
- Meaning
- Serious harm
- Truth
- Submissions
- Responsibility for publication
- Meaning and reference
- Serious harm
- Truth
- Data Protection claim
- Strike out
- Conclusions