KB-2023-003636 - [2025] EWHC 2043 (KB)
Fecha: 05-Ago-2025
Responsibility for publication
Responsibility for publication
The second defendant is the author of the article, which he intended for publication. The first defendant published the article in print and on its website. It is therefore common ground that both defendants are responsible for the print and website publications (and republications) of the article.
The particulars of claim also rely on publication of the article by the second defendant on his website. The second defendant is not employed by the first defendant and the claimant does not allege that the first defendant is vicariously liable for the conduct of the second defendant. It follows that the first defendant is not responsible for any publication of the article by the second defendant in respect of which the first defendant took no part. Conversely, to the extent to which the second defendant provided links to the first defendant’s website publication of the article, both defendants are responsible for the publications that took place when users clicked on those links.
The claimant has not sued on the app version of the article, so it is unnecessary to consider that version further.
- Heading
- A time limited reporting restriction order is in place to prohibit the reporting of the identity of the man that is referred to in this judgment as CVB. While that restriction is in place, no matter m
- The factual background
- The Hindutva
- Golders Green: Saturday 22 May 2021
- BBC: 23 May 2021
- The rally for Israel: Sunday 23 May 2021
- Seminar on Hinduism at the Sapience Institute: April 2022
- Leicester: May – September 2022
- The claimant’s actions on 18 September 2022
- The article
- Organisations disassociate from the claimant
- The causes of the street violence
- The claimant’s evidence
- The evidence of the claimant’s witnesses
- Tort of defamation
- Responsibility
- Meaning
- Serious harm
- Truth
- Submissions
- Responsibility for publication
- Meaning and reference
- Serious harm
- Truth
- Data Protection claim
- Strike out
- Conclusions