King's / Queen's Bench Division of the High Court
KB-2023-003636 - [2025] EWHC 2043 (KB)
Fecha: 05-Ago-2025
Serious harm
Serious harm
Section 1(1) of the Defamation Act 2013 states:
“A statement is not defamatory unless its publication has caused or is likely to cause serious harm to the reputation of the claimant.”
This requires an enquiry into the facts of the impact of the publication to determine whether there has been some historic harm which actually occurred as a result of the publication, or whether, as a matter of fact, it is likely to cause actual harm in the future. It is thus not sufficient to establish that the words of the publication were liable to cause harm: Lachaux v Independent Print Ltd [2019] UKSC 27; [2020] AC 612 per Lord Sumption at [12] and [14] – [15].
- Heading
- A time limited reporting restriction order is in place to prohibit the reporting of the identity of the man that is referred to in this judgment as CVB. While that restriction is in place, no matter m
- The factual background
- The Hindutva
- Golders Green: Saturday 22 May 2021
- BBC: 23 May 2021
- The rally for Israel: Sunday 23 May 2021
- Seminar on Hinduism at the Sapience Institute: April 2022
- Leicester: May – September 2022
- The claimant’s actions on 18 September 2022
- The article
- Organisations disassociate from the claimant
- The causes of the street violence
- The claimant’s evidence
- The evidence of the claimant’s witnesses
- Tort of defamation
- Responsibility
- Meaning
- Serious harm
- Truth
- Submissions
- Responsibility for publication
- Meaning and reference
- Serious harm
- Truth
- Data Protection claim
- Strike out
- Conclusions