![HT-2022-000311 & HT-2022-000254 - [2024] EWHC 3179 (TCC)](https://backend.juristeca.com/files/emisores/logo_yJUntHA.png){kind=logo}
Technology and Construction Court
HT-2022-000311 & HT-2022-000254 - [2024] EWHC 3179 (TCC)
Fecha: 11-Dic-2024
Breach of statutory duty
Breach of statutory duty
As set out above, the leaseholders also advance claims for breach of section 2A of the DPA and seek a BLO in respect of building safety risks. I address this further below.
- Heading
- The parties
- The claimants’ case in summary
- Procedural matters and representation
- Amended Particulars of Claim
- The Agreement for Sale
- The purported rescission of the FPA and RTM’s claim
- The no loss defence
- The position of the leaseholders and the leaseholders’ claims
- The leases
- Insurance
- Breach of statutory duty
- Negligence
- Nuisance
- The rainwater ingress
- Breaches
- Click St Andrews’ position
- Discussion
- Other defects and expert evidence
- The Rivett reports
- Mr Ferguson
- Miscellaneous defects
- Mr Ebbatson
- Remedial works
- Quantum
- Flat 1
- Flat 5
- Flat 6
- Flat 7
- Flat 8
- Flat 9
- Flat 10
- Flat 11
- Flat 12
- Flat 13
- Mitigation
- Conclusions