Juristeca
Juristeca País
    [2024] UKUT 398 (AAC)
    Upper Tribunal Administrative Appeals Chamber

    [2024] UKUT 398 (AAC)

    Fecha: 10-Oct-2024

    The procedural fairness issue

    The procedural fairness issue

    14.

    It seems to us the most efficient way of dealing with this appeal is to consider, first, one aspect of the procedural unfairness ground. This requires us to summarise, in some detail, some particulars of the proceedings before the TC. We will first do that, and then present our analysis of the procedural unfairness issue.

    • Heading
    • The appeal is allowed
    • The TC’s written decision
    • Jurisdiction of the Upper Tribunal
    • The Upper Tribunal proceedings in this case
    • The appellants’ grounds of appeal
    • The procedural fairness issue
    • Summary of Mr Saleh’s letters to OTC prior to the public inquiry
    • Summary of the call up letter to Excell Logistics Ltd
    • Public inquiry transcript
    • Our analysis of the procedural unfairness argument
    • First question: was Miss Kufandirori fairly made aware of the contents of Mr Saleh’s letters to OTC prior to the public inquiry?
    • Second question: fairness of Miss Kufandirori not being made aware of the content of Mr Saleh’s letters to OTC prior to public inquiry
    • Third question: did the unfairness make a material difference?
    • Conclusion on procedural unfairness
    • Conclusions

    Otros enlaces de interés:

    Jurisprudencia clasificada por bienes e inmuebles Jurisprudencia clasificada por contravención de las normas jurídicas Jurisprudencia clasificada por derechos de la unión europea Jurisprudencia clasificada por derechos fundamentales Jurisprudencia clasificada por materias del derecho Jurisprudencia clasificada por profesiones Jurisprudencia clasificada por sector agrario Jurisprudencia clasificada por sectores de la sociedad

    Síguenos en

    Políticas de eliminación | Políticas de privacidad

    © 2026 Juristeca