![[2024] UKUT 171 (AAC)](https://backend.juristeca.com/files/emisores/logo_3a2BKne.png){kind=logo}
KK’s allegation
KK’s allegation
On the evening of 30 June 2022, KK told the Centre Manager (CM) that RR was making her uncomfortable. CM reported this to a Designated Safeguarding Lead (WF). This is the statement that KK made that evening (page 131):
Monday 27/06
At 11am KK was approached by RR who asked her about college and if she wanted to be a lawyer and how her skills mean she could be very successful.
He then said she looked more beautiful than Karina Kapoor a Bollywood actress and showed her photos.
In class they are an odd number so he asked her to swap places so she was the odd number and asked her to be his partner and he used that to ask her if she was free in the evenings and if she had a boyfriend and that he could be her boyfriend.
On the break, 11am, he asked her to stay back, she tried to leave and he insisted. He asked her for her number and she gave him a fake number but he tried to call and insisted on her actual number. She gave it.
She then tried to leave and he asked her if she’d liked to be in a relationship.
She was extremely uncomfortable.
Then she received a messenger from a ‘John Winkle’ based in the ‘Kabul embassy’ to a ‘Karina’ which is what he repeatedly mis-calls her.
- Heading
- This decision is given under section 4 of the Safeguarding Vulnerable Groups Act 2006 (SVGA from now on)
- Reasons for Decision DBS’s decision and findings
- The appeal to the Upper Tribunal
- Section 4 SVGA
- RR’s account
- KK’s allegation
- There followed a messenger screenshot showing contact from John Winkle Disciplinary action
- The LADO report
- KK’s allegation
- The disciplinary hearing
- The John Winkle message
- CM’s partiality
- Conclusions