The LADO report
The LADO report
We have a little more information about the hearing from Section D of the LADO record (pages 70-72), which was written by CM. It contains some comments on the hearing. CM and WF
asked RR to outline his version of the events. The details were similar but inconsistent. He found it very hard to explain how the student had his number, although he did confirm that they had exchanged numbers. We did not ask him about the ‘John Winkle’ messages as he stated repeatedly he had never used the number or contacted the student apart from one missed-call initially when they were alone in class. There were many vague and slightly incongruous details in this aspect of his account. He did admit, however, several times to asking the student for outside of classroom contact.
Our assessment of the evidence
- Heading
- This decision is given under section 4 of the Safeguarding Vulnerable Groups Act 2006 (SVGA from now on)
- Reasons for Decision DBS’s decision and findings
- The appeal to the Upper Tribunal
- Section 4 SVGA
- RR’s account
- KK’s allegation
- There followed a messenger screenshot showing contact from John Winkle Disciplinary action
- The LADO report
- KK’s allegation
- The disciplinary hearing
- The John Winkle message
- CM’s partiality
- Conclusions
![[2024] UKUT 171 (AAC)](https://backend.juristeca.com/files/emisores/logo_3a2BKne.png)