A bare outline of the course of the appeal
A bare outline of the course of the appeal
The Veterans UK decision-maker, acting on behalf of the Secretary of State for Defence, decided that the claimant was entitled to an AFCS award on the basis of his PTSD at Table 3, Item 4, Level 12. The claimant appealed to the First-tier Tribunal, which allowed his appeal in part, ruling that the appropriate descriptor was a step higher at Table 3, Item 3, Level 10. The claimant now appeals to the Upper Tribunal against the decision of the First-tier Tribunal, having argued that the proper descriptor to be applied was in fact at the still higher rate of Table 3, Item 1, Level 6.
- Heading
- The decision of the Upper Tribunal is to dismiss the appeal. The decision of the First-tier Tribunal made on 25 April 2023 under case number AFCS/00735/2020 does not involve any material error of law
- The subject matter of this appeal to the Upper Tribunal
- A bare outline of the course of the appeal
- The Upper Tribunal oral hearing of the appeal
- A summary of the Upper Tribunal’s decision
- The factual background to this appeal
- Table 3 - Mental disorders(*)
- The consultant psychiatrist’s 2017 report
- The Secretary of State’s decision
- The First-tier Tribunal’s decision
- The Upper Tribunal’s grant of permission to appeal
- The test for permanence
- The Appellant’s grounds of appeal
- The Respondent’s response
- Analysis
- Ground 1
- Ground 2
- Ground 3
- Ground 4
- Conclusions
![[2024] UKUT 191 (AAC)](https://backend.juristeca.com/files/emisores/logo_3a2BKne.png)