![[2024] UKUT 191 (AAC)](https://backend.juristeca.com/files/emisores/logo_3a2BKne.png){kind=logo}
A summary of the Upper Tribunal’s decision
A summary of the Upper Tribunal’s decision
I dismiss the claimant’s further appeal to the Upper Tribunal. This is because the decision of the First-tier Tribunal does not involve any material legal error.
To protect the claimant’s privacy, I refer to the claimant in this decision as simply ‘the Appellant’ or as ‘Mr H’ rather than by name. To avoid the risk of ‘jigsaw identification’, I also provide only the barest information about the factual background to the appeal. However, the limited details that are supplied are sufficient to understand the context of the case.
- Heading
- The decision of the Upper Tribunal is to dismiss the appeal. The decision of the First-tier Tribunal made on 25 April 2023 under case number AFCS/00735/2020 does not involve any material error of law
- The subject matter of this appeal to the Upper Tribunal
- A bare outline of the course of the appeal
- The Upper Tribunal oral hearing of the appeal
- A summary of the Upper Tribunal’s decision
- The factual background to this appeal
- Table 3 - Mental disorders(*)
- The consultant psychiatrist’s 2017 report
- The Secretary of State’s decision
- The First-tier Tribunal’s decision
- The Upper Tribunal’s grant of permission to appeal
- The test for permanence
- The Appellant’s grounds of appeal
- The Respondent’s response
- Analysis
- Ground 1
- Ground 2
- Ground 3
- Ground 4
- Conclusions