![[2024] UKUT 196 (AAC)](https://backend.juristeca.com/files/emisores/logo_3a2BKne.png){kind=logo}
The Upper Tribunal’s analysis
The Upper Tribunal’s analysis
Introduction
As noted above, the Appellant advances two primary grounds of appeal. The first is that the FTT is said to have erred in law by failing to investigate the circumstances of the 2019 claim (or claims) and indeed by finding that there had been no such claim. The second is that in calculating the Appellant’s capital the FTT is said to have erred in law by not disregarding the compensation payment made under the ACAS settlement agreement.
- Heading
- The decision of the Upper Tribunal is to dismiss the appeal
- The key chronology
- The Secretary of State’s response to the appeal to the First-tier Tribunal
- The First-tier Tribunal’s decision on the Appellant’s appeal
- The Upper Tribunal’s decision to give the Appellant permission to appeal
- The Upper Tribunal’s analysis
- Ground 1: the 2019 claim for universal credit
- Ground 2: the compensation payment
- Conclusions