Conclusions
Conclusion and Disposal
For the reasons set out above, the Appellant’s appeal should be allowed.
We conclude for the purposes of section 4(6)(b) of the Act that there were material mistakes of fact in the first finding of relevant conduct and a mistake of law in relation to the second finding or relevant conduct upon which the ultimate decision to include the Appellant on the ABL was based.
We therefore remit the decision of the DBS to include the Appellant on ABL for it to make a new decision in light of our findings of fact for the purposes of section 4(7)(a) of the Act. We also direct for the purposes of section 4(7)(b) that she remains on the list pending the DBS making its new decision.
Authorised for release:
Judge Rupert Jones
Judge of the Upper Tribunal Dated: 12 September 2024
- Heading
- The decision of the Upper Tribunal is to allow the appeal of the Appellant
- Rule 14 Anonymity Orders and directions
- The Background
- The Barring Process
- Findings of Relevant Conduct
- The Final Decision Letter
- Appellant’s Grounds of Appeal
- The evidence in the appeal
- The Appellant’s oral evidence
- Law
- it is satisfied that the person has engaged in relevant conduct, and
- it is satisfied that it is appropriate to include the person in the list
- on any point of law
- If the [ Upper] Tribunal remits a matter to [DBS] under subsection (6)(b)–
- a. “on any point of law” (section 4(2)(a) of the Act)
- remit the matter to DBS for a new decision
- DBS’s submissions
- No material mistake of fact
- Insufficient Interest Challenge
- Acted on Advice Challenge
- Lack of Training Challenge
- Lack of Time Challenge
- Other matters
- No mistake of law
- Discussion: Findings of Fact and Analysis of grounds of appeal
- Ground 1
- Mistake of fact: second finding of relevant conduct – Finding 2
- Mistake of Law - Proportionality
- are they no more than are necessary to accomplish it?
- Conclusions
![[2024] UKUT 286 (AAC)](https://backend.juristeca.com/files/emisores/logo_3a2BKne.png)