Findings of Relevant Conduct
Findings of Relevant Conduct
The Final Decision letter [139] states that, upon consideration of all the available information, the DBS was satisfied that:
“On 18 September 2022 you failed to contact the District Nurse Team and report that a service user ([X], aged 78) had cut her catheter tube as per care plan guidance, and following the service user reporting that she felt like her bladder was burning and was in pain, you failed to take any action in response to this concern.
On a date leading up to 6 July 2021 you breached PPE policy by removing your facemask to take a photo with a visitor outside of the home.”
The DBS concluded that both of these findings amounted to “relevant conduct” within the meaning of the Act which “endangered a vulnerable adult or was likely to endanger a vulnerable adult”. The allegations of relevant conduct were both found proven.
The DBS also explained why it was satisfied that in all the circumstances a barring decision - to include her on the Adults’ Barred List - was appropriate and proportionate [139]. The Appellant did not exercise her right to ask DBS to review its decision.
- Heading
- The decision of the Upper Tribunal is to allow the appeal of the Appellant
- Rule 14 Anonymity Orders and directions
- The Background
- The Barring Process
- Findings of Relevant Conduct
- The Final Decision Letter
- Appellant’s Grounds of Appeal
- The evidence in the appeal
- The Appellant’s oral evidence
- Law
- it is satisfied that the person has engaged in relevant conduct, and
- it is satisfied that it is appropriate to include the person in the list
- on any point of law
- If the [ Upper] Tribunal remits a matter to [DBS] under subsection (6)(b)–
- a. “on any point of law” (section 4(2)(a) of the Act)
- remit the matter to DBS for a new decision
- DBS’s submissions
- No material mistake of fact
- Insufficient Interest Challenge
- Acted on Advice Challenge
- Lack of Training Challenge
- Lack of Time Challenge
- Other matters
- No mistake of law
- Discussion: Findings of Fact and Analysis of grounds of appeal
- Ground 1
- Mistake of fact: second finding of relevant conduct – Finding 2
- Mistake of Law - Proportionality
- are they no more than are necessary to accomplish it?
- Conclusions
![[2024] UKUT 286 (AAC)](https://backend.juristeca.com/files/emisores/logo_3a2BKne.png)