The factual context of this appeal
The factual context of this appeal
The background to this appeal was helpfully summarised thus by the First-tier Tribunal in its decision:
The Appellant conducts rights of way research in relation to Kent on a voluntary basis on behalf of the British Horse Society. For this purpose, he needs high quality copies of individual tithe maps. As at September 2021, he had researched more than thirty ancient parishes in Kent and intended to research more. He says the research calls for frequent reference to the tithe maps prepared for parishes in Kent under the Tithe Act 1836; extracts from the maps may be required for inclusion in applications to record or upgrade rights of way made to the Council; the Council holds the vast majority of the maps in its records office; there are about 425 maps; with the benefit of a Heritage Lottery Fund grant of £310,000 in or around 1997, the Council has restored and digitised the maps. The Appellant told us in the hearing that he looks for various information in the maps which might indicate an unrecorded right of way, for example a route coloured in sienna might, taken together with other information, indicate an unrecorded right of way.
The original tithe maps are extremely large, many being 14 foot and over (4.25 metres or more) in both length and width. The digital versions are stored on an external hard drive which can be ordered in the archive Searchroom in the Council’s records office in Maidstone. The digital images are not available online or on the Council’s networked storage because of the total size of the images. Digital copies may be purchased at £15 a map with a discount for bulk orders (it does not appear to be in dispute that the Council’s charge for copies of all the digital maps in question would be £5,100). Both the original tithe maps and the digital copies can be consulted free of charge in the archive Searchroom, which is open 5 days a week (Tuesday-Saturday, 9 a.m.-5 p.m.).
- Heading
- The decision of the Upper Tribunal is to dismiss the appeal. The decision of the First-tier Tribunal made on 8 January 2024 under number EA/2022/0455 was not made in error of law (section 11 of the Tr
- Introduction
- Abbreviations
- The parties to this appeal
- The factual context of this appeal
- The Appellant’s request for environmental information
- The Information Commissioner’s Decision Notice
- The First-tier Tribunal’s decision and the further grounds of appeal
- Ground 1: Was the information ‘publicly available’ within regulation 6(1)(b)?
- The First-tier Tribunal’s decision
- The parties’ submissions on Ground 1
- Discussion
- Ground 2: Was the information ‘easily accessible’ within regulation 6(1)(b)?
- The First-tier Tribunal’s decision
- The parties’ submissions on Ground 2
- Discussion
- Ground 3: The application of the FOIA regime
- The First-tier Tribunal’s decision
- The parties’ submissions on Ground 3
- Discussion
- Conclusions
![[2024] UKUT 320 (AAC)](https://backend.juristeca.com/files/emisores/logo_3a2BKne.png)