The basis for a “relevant conduct” barring decision
The basis for a “relevant conduct” barring decision
Paragraphs 3 and 4 of Schedule 3 to the 2006 Act deal with behaviour or “relevant conduct” in relation to children , those relating to vulnerable adults are at paragraphs 9 and 10 and are essentially the same:
(1) This paragraph applies to a person if—
it appears to DBSthat the person —
has (at any time) engaged in relevant conduct, and
is or has been, or might in future be, engaged in regulated activity relating to children, and
DBS proposes to include him in the children’s barred list.
DBS must give the person the opportunity to make representations as to why he should not be included in the children’s barred list.
DBS must include the person in the children’s barred list if—
it is satisfied that the person has engaged in relevant conduct,
(aa) it has reason to believe that the person is or has been, or might in future be, engaged in regulated activity relating to children, and
it is satisfied that it is appropriate to include the person in the list.
(1) For the purposes of paragraph 3 relevant conduct is—
conduct which endangers a child adult or is likely to endanger a child;
conduct which, if repeated against or in relation to a child, would endanger that child or would be likely to endanger him;
…..
A person's conduct endangers a child adult if he—
harms a child,
causes a child to be harmed,
puts a child at risk of harm,
attempts to harm a child, or
incites another to harm a child.
- Heading
- The decision of the Upper Tribunal is to dismiss the appeal
- or any information that would be likely to lead to the identification of any of them
- Legal Framework
- The basis for a “relevant conduct” barring decision
- Rights of appeal
- Caselaw
- [55]. The Upper Tribunal also made findings of fact and made comments on other matters. Section 4(7) of the Act provides that where the Upper Tribunal remits a matter to the DBS it "may set out any fi
- There is no limit to the form that a mistake of fact may take. It may consist of an incorrect finding, an incomplete finding, or an omission. It may relate to anything that may properly be the subject
- And at
- And they concluded as follows Drawing the various strands together, we conclude as follows
- Thus, the fundamental point relevant to this case is that unlike in an appeal under section 11 of the Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Act 2007 , it is not necessary for the Upper Tribunal to find an
- “We have considered all the information we hold and are satisfied of the following
- seek timely and necessary medical treatment for him and further
- On 18/4/24 the Respondent sent a Final Decision letter to FKF setting out the Barring Decision [373-377]
- Conclusions
![[2025] UKUT 95 (AAC)](https://backend.juristeca.com/files/emisores/logo_3a2BKne.png)