the “relevant day” was 20 March 2019
the “relevant day” was 20 March 2019.
In terms of the application of s.30 to the facts of this case, it is common ground that: (1) an award of tax credits had been made to the claimant in respect of the 2018/2019 tax year (this was an award made under s.14 TCA 2002) and (2) the award included the “relevant day” (i.e. 20 March 2019). The sole question for the purposes of s.30 is therefore whether the claimant made a “valid declaration of eligibility for an entitlement period”, which gives rise to two sub-issues: (1) did he make a “declaration of eligibility” and (2) if so, was it “valid”?
By s.4(1) of the 2014 Act, a “declaration of eligibility” is “a statement made by a person for an entitlement period which states that the person is an eligible person for the entitlement period”.
A “declaration of eligibility” is “valid” (pursuant to s.4(2)) if: (1) “HMRC are
satisfied that the person is an eligible person for the entitlement period”, (2) no other person holds or is seeking to hold a childcare account in relation to a relevant child and (3) the declaration is made in accordance with the requirements of the relevant regulations. The 2015 Regulations contain requirements for making declarations. These include, at regulation 22, a requirement that declarations are (ordinarily) made using electronic communications.
by s.3(1), a person is an “eligible person for an entitlement period” if he meets the conditions of eligibility in ss.6 to 13
the conditions include, at s.13(1)(a), that “no other relevant childcare support is payable to the person in respect of any relevant period”. “Relevant period” is defined at s.13(4) as a period which (a) “includes the date of the declaration”, (b) “includes the whole or any part of the entitlement period for which the declaration is made”, or (c) “falls within that entitlement period”. By s.13(5), in the case of a declaration of eligibility made for the purposes of opening a childcare account, the “entitlement period” for which the declaration is made is to be read as a reference to the period of 3 months beginning with the date of the declaration. (In the instant case, the claimant was making a declaration of eligibility for the purposes of opening a childcare account. In those circumstances, the date of the first entitlement period will not be known until the application is successful and therefore the Act deems a three month period, commencing from the date of the declaration.)
the phrase “other relevant childcare support” is defined at s.13(2) as “any payments towards the costs of childcare which are made out of funds provided by a national authority…”
the term “national authority” is defined at s.13(3) as: (a) a Minister of the Crown (within the meaning of the Ministers of the Crown Act 1975 (“the MCA 1975”)), (b) the Scottish Ministers (c) the Welsh Ministers (d) a Northern Ireland department.
- Heading
- Section 1
- w as HMRC v RS (No.2) (TC) [2022] UKUT 246 correctly decided in its interpretation of Article 7(6) of the Welfare Reform Act 2012 (Commencement No.23 and Transitional and Transitory Provisions) Order
- SC946/21/00244 (on appeal UA-2023-001612-TC ) dated 9 December 2020 that he had made a valid declaration of eligibility for tax-free childcare and so his entitlement to tax credits was correctly termi
- SC946/19/02420 (on appeal UA-2023-001611-TC ) dated 9 August 2019 that he was not able to make a new claim for tax credits for any period after 19 March 2019
- The Tribunal’s Statement of Reasons
- The Statutory Framework
- The Claimant’s Submissions
- entitlement period and therefore terminated his tax credits award immediately prior to that date following that termination, HMRC issued various decision notices and other notices, which were subject to a previous appeal. The Upper Tribunal in UA-202
- the 2018/2019 tax year. The decision notice was issued to the claimant on 11 December 2020
- Ground 2: The alleged “declaration of eligibility” was not “valid”
- he was in fact an eligible person, because tax credits were not payable in respect of the relevant period
- Issues raised by HMRC
- Ground 3: S.30 of the 2014 Act no longer applies
- UA-2023-001611-TC
- in relation to Appeal SC946/21/00244 (“Appeal 1”): on 14 March 2019, the
- in relation to Appeal SC946/19/02420 (“Appeal 2”): he was not permitted to apply for tax credits in August 2019
- Factual Background
- The TFC Scheme
- Appeal 1
- The Legal Framework
- by s.5(1) the length of the “entitlement period” is 3 months, subject to any regulations altering that length
- the day on which the declaration was made was 14 March 2019. This was the claimant’s first application
- the “relevant day” was 20 March 2019
- The declaration question
- https://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ukgwa/20190317223446/https:/www.gov.uk/tax-free-childcare which contained the portal which the claimant would have used to make his application
- ( https://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ukgwa/20190321044737/https:/www.gov.uk/apply-30-hours-free-childcare )
- The validity question
- in this regard, the position is similar to that in HMRC v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions and GS [2023] UKUT 9 (AAC) where the Upper Tribunal considered a regulation containing a requirement
- The “other relevant childcare support” question
- HMRC’s non-ministerial position is also clear from the Explanatory Notes to the 2005 Act
- if he is right, a recipient of the childcare element of WTC would necessarily
- The ceasing to have effect argument
- comity: should the Upper Tribunal follow RS (No.2) in the interests of comity?
- The Legal Framework
- RS (No.2)
- Comity
- The “for the next tax year” argument
- Discussion
- The validity question
- The “other relevant childcare support” argument
- The ceasing to have effect argument
- Appeal 2
- Conclusions
![[2025] UKUT 166 (AAC)](https://backend.juristeca.com/files/emisores/logo_3a2BKne.png)