Endnote
49. It is apparent that the appellants may now have acquired the right of permanent residence, given that it appears the first appellant has worked continuously for over 5 years. That is not a factor we can take into account when assessing whether there is an error of law in the decision of the First-tier Tribunal. It is of course open to the appellants to make fresh applications for certificates confirming their right of permanent residence. We express no view as to whether such applications would be successful, given that the position of the second and third appellants as dependants of their mother is unclear, in light of their ages. Signed
Date
Upper Tribunal Judge Rintoul
- DETERMINATION AND REASONS
- Shabani v SSHD (EEA – jobseekers; nursery education)
- Jessy St Prix v SSWP
- The hearing
- Our Assessment
- AG and others (EEA-jobseeker-self-sufficient person-proof) Germany
- gum (EEA – worker – jobseeker) Pakistan
- Antonissen
- Shabani (EEA - jobseekers; nursery education)
- Hoekstra (nee Unger)
- Bernini v Minister van Onderwijs en Wetenschappen
- Martinez Sala v Freistaat Bayern
- Lair v Hanover University
- Brown v Secretary of State for Scotland
- Lair
- Shabani
- AG & Others
- Antonissen
- St Prix
- EC Commission v Belgium
- Barry v Southwark
- Applying the law to the facts
- Endnote
